Boris Johnson-Prime Minister (Vol 8)

Boris Johnson-Prime Minister (Vol 8)

Author
Discussion

Blue62

7,570 posts

139 months

monkfish1 said:
Hmmm. A valid point, except that they all lie, most of the time. Both PM and MP's

Why the interest in this particular lie?

If we are going to investigate lies, lets do them all.
It’s been done to death and unless you’ve been living under a rock or diet exclusively on the Daily Bile, you’d know that what our former PM has been up to is without precedent.

The stories are everywhere if you could be bothered, which you obviously can’t. He is Just William holding the catapult behind his back, a cunning, clever confection of a human being without a conscience and with only one single interest in life, himself.

I hope he really is gone this time, but I fear not.

Escort3500

10,720 posts

132 months

Blue62 said:
monkfish1 said:
Hmmm. A valid point, except that they all lie, most of the time. Both PM and MP's

Why the interest in this particular lie?

If we are going to investigate lies, lets do them all.
It’s been done to death and unless you’ve been living under a rock or diet exclusively on the Daily Bile, you’d know that what our former PM has been up to is without precedent.

The stories are everywhere if you could be bothered, which you obviously can’t. He is Just William holding the catapult behind his back, a cunning, clever confection of a human being without a conscience and with only one single interest in life, himself.

I hope he really is gone this time, but I fear not.
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament

TorqueVR

1,793 posts

186 months

Stolen from the Sean Connery Joke thread
The Johnson Defence
"Your Honour, although my client was wearing a balaclava and brought his own shotgun he was unaware he was attending a bank robbery"

Garvin

4,918 posts

164 months

Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!

Rumblestripe

2,401 posts

149 months

Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Ah, the plaintiff cry of Johnsonista.

"what about they cry, WHAT ABOUT!"

Blair, you may have noticed is no longer PM, no longer an MP.

sugerbear

3,073 posts

145 months

Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
this is laughable, the tories would have done exactly the same, they wouldn't have sided with the French, they would have even more accommodating of the Americans demands than Blair was.

JagLover

39,886 posts

222 months

sugerbear said:
this is laughable, the tories would have done exactly the same, they wouldn't have sided with the French, they would have even more accommodating of the Americans demands than Blair was.
It is highly debateable though whether they would have issued such a blatant lie as the 45 minute dossier though. That is more the Campbell school of spin, later satirised in "In the loop".

Bannock

1,919 posts

17 months

JagLover said:
sugerbear said:
this is laughable, the tories would have done exactly the same, they wouldn't have sided with the French, they would have even more accommodating of the Americans demands than Blair was.
It is highly debateable though whether they would have issued such a blatant lie as the 45 minute dossier though. That is more the Campbell school of spin, later satirised in "In the loop".
I personally know the guy who was Michael Howard's PR back in the day. I'm confident he'd have been worse than Campbell, had Howard won an election and given him the chief political advisor's role. I mean the fker was on Blind Date once, in dungarees and no shoes.

There you go, there's some equally pointless and baseless speculation to go along with yours.

Garvin

4,918 posts

164 months

Rumblestripe said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Ah, the plaintiff cry of Johnsonista.

"what about they cry, WHAT ABOUT!"

Blair, you may have noticed is no longer PM, no longer an MP.
The Blairista is unmasked!

The challenge was about higher levels and seriousness that referred to all politicians. You obviously consider Blair’s misdemeanour which significantly damaged the UK less serious than Boris’.

Edited by Garvin on Friday 24th March 11:01

Garvin

4,918 posts

164 months

sugerbear said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
this is laughable, the tories would have done exactly the same, they wouldn't have sided with the French, they would have even more accommodating of the Americans demands than Blair was.
A pure subjective response based on no evidence whatsoever. Be that as it may it’s irrelevant to the discussion. The subject is about the seriousness of Boris’ lies being at a “much higher level”. History proves this not to be the case unless you consider dragging the UK into an illegal war by fabricating evidence to Parliament less severe than quaffing a bit of cake and a bit of fizz.

blueg33

32,205 posts

211 months

Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Look a squirrel !



Garvin

4,918 posts

164 months

blueg33 said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Look a squirrel !
As they say, the truth hurts.

Riff Raff

4,867 posts

182 months

Garvin said:
blueg33 said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Look a squirrel !
As they say, the truth hurts.
There’s a series on radio 4 at the moment about the Iraq war. ‘Shock and War’. It’s worth a listen. As always the real story is a bit more complicated than just the 45 minute Dodgy Dossier sound bite.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001k83m

Frik

13,405 posts

230 months

Garvin said:
A pure subjective response based on no evidence whatsoever. Be that as it may it’s irrelevant to the discussion. The subject is about the seriousness of Boris’ lies being at a “much higher level”. History proves this not to be the case unless you consider dragging the UK into an illegal war by fabricating evidence to Parliament less severe than quaffing a bit of cake and a bit of fizz.
That covers the seriousness part. What about the frequency?

Garvin

4,918 posts

164 months

Riff Raff said:
Garvin said:
blueg33 said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Look a squirrel !
As they say, the truth hurts.
There’s a series on radio 4 at the moment about the Iraq war. ‘Shock and War’. It’s worth a listen. As always the real story is a bit more complicated than just the 45 minute Dodgy Dossier sound bite.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001k83m
Of course. But that doesn’t detract from the Blair getting Campbell to ‘sex up’ the report to Parliament and using it as a lever to get the UK to war. It was a heinous misleading of Parliament with extremely serious consequences.

Garvin

4,918 posts

164 months

Frik said:
That covers the seriousness part. What about the frequency?
OK, but I’ll trade the frequency for the utter seriousness of it. BTW, what was the frequency of Boris’ porky pies to Parliament?

Bannock

1,919 posts

17 months

Garvin said:
sugerbear said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
this is laughable, the tories would have done exactly the same, they wouldn't have sided with the French, they would have even more accommodating of the Americans demands than Blair was.
A pure subjective response based on no evidence whatsoever. Be that as it may it’s irrelevant to the discussion. The subject is about the seriousness of Boris’ lies being at a “much higher level”. History proves this not to be the case unless you consider dragging the UK into an illegal war by fabricating evidence to Parliament less severe than quaffing a bit of cake and a bit of fizz.
How far back does "what about" have legal effect? How does Blair's despicable behaviour serve to exonerate Boris Johnson's despicable behaviour? Can we "what about" Anthony Eden and Suez? Thatcher and the Poll Tax? Pitt the Younger and Prince George's disappearing socks?

Oh that's right, it has no legal effect. Because it's irrelevant.

It's all subjective, though, despite your appeals to "history proves this". For someone who watched their Mum die through a care home window, and then couldn't hold a funeral for her, maybe they would be put out by Johnson quaffing champagne and eating cake in a manner contrary to the law at the same time more than by Blair's manipulations.

Rivenink

2,911 posts

93 months

Garvin said:
Riff Raff said:
Garvin said:
blueg33 said:
Garvin said:
Escort3500 said:
Exactly. We all know that most politicians of all hues and at all levels lie; to varying degrees it’s a default setting.

However, the frequency and seriousness of self-serving Johnson’s lies take it to a much higher level than most in Parliament
A “much higher level”? Really? You consider Boris’ porky pies a higher level that Blair’s 45minute deployment of WMDs and off to war we go!
Look a squirrel !
As they say, the truth hurts.
There’s a series on radio 4 at the moment about the Iraq war. ‘Shock and War’. It’s worth a listen. As always the real story is a bit more complicated than just the 45 minute Dodgy Dossier sound bite.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001k83m
Of course. But that doesn’t detract from the Blair getting Campbell to ‘sex up’ the report to Parliament and using it as a lever to get the UK to war. It was a heinous misleading of Parliament with extremely serious consequences.
So is your point that Johnson shouldn't be facing censure for misleading Parliament because Blair did so 20 years ago, and wasn't censured?

JagLover

39,886 posts

222 months

Bannock said:
How far back does "what about" have legal effect? How does Blair's despicable behaviour serve to exonerate Boris Johnson's despicable behaviour? Can we "what about" Anthony Eden and Suez? Thatcher and the Poll Tax? Pitt the Younger and Prince George's disappearing socks?
We are talking of lying and misleading parliament. The poll tax was misguided but not as far as I am aware based upon a lie.

Eden and Suez was the exact same scenario, he lied about what he had prearranged with the Israelis and French. He resigned due to both this and the failure of the policy.


S600BSB

2,124 posts

93 months

Garvin said:
Frik said:
That covers the seriousness part. What about the frequency?
OK, but I’ll trade the frequency for the utter seriousness of it. BTW, what was the frequency of Boris’ porky pies to Parliament?
Daily? Certainly every PMQs?